Critically Evaluate Bower`s Network Theory Of Emotional Processing In Terms Of Explaining And Predicting Cognitive Biases In Depression And Anxiety

mandrel s Network Theory and its Link in doctrine and AnxietyBower s (1981 , 1991 ) influential network theory assumed that whim bows automatically activate all associated representations in retrospect . Bower (1981 ) suggested that the cite to the development of this theory is considering humans as biological machines present with a cognitive organization (for acquiring and using take in , and to ask what role motives and sensations should play in much(prenominal) a system . Bower (1981 ) suggested that modality can be stand for as a node , or unit , in infract of appearance an associative network model of entrepot . inside such a network , a particular mood whitethorn become linked or associated with events that occur during champion s life cadence when the mood was undergo . Given these relations , when soulf ulness is in a keen mood they may be to a greater extent(prenominal) presumable to retrieve and become consciously aw are of events that occurred at a previous time when the happy mood was experience . Bower (1981 ) referred to this as mood- arouse dependent memory . moreover , a reversal of this effect should also be slick taking a particular event associated with a moodSchwarz (1998 ) certified that Bower s model made two key predictions premier , memory is enhanced when the affective state at the time of encryption matches the affective state at the time of recuperation (state-dependent training . thusly , we are more likely to recede bodily acquired in a particular mood when we are in the same , rather than a different , mood at the time of recall . Second , any disposed corporal is more likely to be retrieved when its affective smack matches the idiosyncratic s mood at the time of recall (mood-congruent memory . Thus information of a positive inclination is more likely to come to mind when we are in a! happy rather than sad moodIn relating mood-memory and its effect to cognitive offshootes in emotion , studies have helped in understanding individual differences in activatedity , and particularly differences in vulnerability to pathological frantic states .

2 general types of study are therefore of special cotton up : those comparing groups differing on mark measures of negative emotionality and those that stress individuals with or without emotional affront such as clinical depression or disturbance states . In most of this look the understood or explicit hypothesis is that differences in how individuals process emotional information may be a causal instrument in the dev elopment or maintenance of emotional diss (Mathews Macleod , 1994Several researchers have account that depressed mood states express more pronounced cognitive biases in those individuals who report a historical history of depressive episodes , suggesting a high level of attribute vulnerability to this emotion (Miranda et al 1990 . Similar findings have been reported concerning the patterns of discriminating solicitude associated with elevated anxiety . Using the peak test detection paradigm to assess distribution of optic attention , MacLeod Mathews (1988 tested separate groups of high trait and downhearted trait anxious students on two occasions , again when state anxiety was low (early in the semester and once when state anxiety was high (in the week before an important examen . When state anxiety...If you want to get a full essay, fellowship it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay