Ray Nagin's Speech: Effective or Ineffective leadership

Introduction: After the incident of Hurricane Katrina that destroyed the American Gulf, the city manager of fresh siege of Orleans atomic number 75 Nagin was questioned and criticized by umpteen whether he was an telling draw or not and whether he dealt with the emergency successfully or not. Many of his raft axiom that Nagins speech was an example of an effective leadership while others didnt accept with that and refused the way he dealt with the agency as a totally. In this paper, I disagree with either the people that said: Ray Nagin was an effective leader. My opinion was in the main based on the analysis of his personal traits that I perceive from his interview in the context of our book. Analysis: In chapter 1, Selznick said that the leaders function is to differentiate the ends of group existence, to design an enterprise distinctively adapted to these ends, and to entertain in line that the design becomes a living public. Also, studying the potence of a lead er, more emphasis should be hardened on the protrudecomes of the total system, including the fulfillment of expectations held by followers. In the reference of Katrina, Nagin failed to cleave control of the situation. He didnt succeed in fate his people and evacuating them when he was given the 2 days notice.

In chapter 3, Stogdill identified fewer personal traits that a leader should possess. I believe Nagin lacked few of these traits. He didnt have enough competency to deal with the whole situation. The incident was difficult on everybody out there, but as a leader on behalf of New Orleans, he was not able to digest control of things in time on himself. He did not use his verba l adeptness in the decorous manner. He use! d improper language all along the speech. He also lacked knowledge of things link to... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay